Asia-Pacific strategy of the United States is

A week the senior U.S. actions in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as the East Asia Summit held in Cambodia, the international media portrayed as between the two big countries of a major strategic game. 20 at the end of the Seventh East Asia Summit through Phnom Penh Development Declaration, announced to the world that the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ( will start negotiations, the declaration said, include the ten ASEAN countries and China, Japan, Korea, India, New Zealand and Australia, a total of 16 countries the the RCEP negotiations will be 2013 years to start the fight for the to 2015 . If successful sign, its impact will cover the 34 billion people, GDP than the EU.

by East Asia and Australia and New Zealand the RCEP start has significance. In order to ensure that the good momentum of sustained growth in this region, the need to establish their own regional market, in view of the United States and the European Union have been difficult to get out of the recession since the financial crisis, the need to further integrate the region's economic ties and market environment. This is in line with the main trend of the economic development in East Asia, and East Asia region taken important measures to promote the development of the world economy.

Recently, the Obama administration moves constantly return to the Asia-Pacific strategy, its main goal seems to be the containment of China, the so-called "China threat" in order to contain China's peaceful rise. The U.S. military also announced a high-profile strategic focus will be turned to the Asia-Pacific region, will its military power to the Pacific. Caused by the economic mainstream is not in tune with the East Asian development trends. As high-level visit to the United States before the summit of East Asian countries and to participate in the summit, the international media that dug the actions of the Chinese corner, but the end result is that the summit issued a Phnom Penh Development Declaration, a series of actions in the United States is only an not a line with mainstream unrest in this region.

Has been in a strong position in the United States in world affairs. It has two advantages: powerful military force, and its military spending accounted for almost half of the world's military spending, military bases all over the world to build a world military power. In certain circumstances, the American so-called strategic shift will occur in areas of war or military confrontation; dollar International Monetary monopoly position with the United States military strong complementary brothers. But since 2008 because of the dollar triggered world financial crisis, especially in the United States for several consecutive weeks quantitative easing monetary policy, making the U.S. the reputation of decline, its international currency status be questioned, also facing a crisis.

Obama administration to return to the Asia-Pacific strategic action, the objective has been highlighted in the mainly mainstream consciousness of the economy with the development of East Asia in terms of military strategy, which is very coordinated. From the current situation in the United States to see the output of the Asia-Pacific region in the United States only two aspects: First, the military, munitions and war atmosphere of terror; and the second is the U.S. dollar, and the dollar currently have or are changing the nature of the original by the economic output variable for economic plunder. Ever trade deficit with the U.S. economy only in dollars to balance, beyond the conventional deficit of the U.S. government fiscal policy and quantitative easing, intentional or not, of the East Asian economic plunder by the continuous depreciation of the U.S. dollar to the development of East Asia Bonus redistribution.

From the United States to return to the Asia-Pacific strategy process, close ties with Japan, the first to be a major influence. The right-wing forces in Japan that followed by the return of the United States to the Asia-Pacific strategy, you can relive the old dream before World War II, to give up has been pursuing the development of its post-war economic state policy, the armed forces strong as Japan's first choice to return to the world powers, especially the neighboring countries provocative actions in China, resulting in the relations between the two countries in the post-war low point of. This also affects the development of the Japanese economy, causing the Japanese economy to be materially affected by the recession, foreign trade dropped, political turmoil, showing a declining trend. The other, followed by the return of the United States to the countries of the Asia-Pacific strategy, the Philippines, also in the economic development there has been slowing down, lack of coordination with the rapid development of the East Asian economy as a whole.

Since the end of the Cold War, the strategic focus of the United States from Eastern Europe, the Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq and the entire Middle East, wherever there is a common characteristic is that unrest. Cause these areas to economic stagnation or retrogression, political instability deepened. Finally, the United States will abandon the region, and transferred to other areas. The discarding the international strategy in the United States, East Asian countries have to be aware of. Should be the example of the East Asian countries on the U.S. global strategy. Of course, the results of the East Asia Summit, has been described to the Obama administration of East Asia, of its intention to return to the strategy, perhaps the Obama administration a new Asia-Pacific strategy will make a fresh start, will change for the economic integration into the military intervention. Then, China and the United States will truly become the twin engines of economic development in the Asia-Pacific region, which will also be established between China and the United States of a new type of relations between big powers of the 21st century.